Monday, June 30, 2008
What do you do with a slow growing tumor?
I had some growth back in February, the first time that showed after 14 weeks of no treatment. They put me on Xeloda then and I've been on it since. The one cat scan showed no growth so they said to continue. I'm to have another in July to see what's up. My new oncologist said that if it shows no growth again, we may be able to take a "vacation" in August. Whoopie!
I have a new Oncologist. This one, Dr. Tom Dragovich is a GI cancer specialist. Seemed to me that I should be seeing someone who specializes in the type of cancer it seems that I have. Unfortunately, I am less certain all the time exactly what cancer type I actually have!
The bottom line, at least for this moment is that it seems I might have a better prognosis than I had almost a year ago. Since I have a sluggish, passive, lazy, "indolent"type cancer, hopefully I can assume that that will continue for a while and I can make a plan that is further out than a couple of months. I guess.
Other than the little change in the cancer itself, a lot has been happening. I decided that if I have to deal with this stuff, I'd better get some "ducks in a row" as they say. So, I've moved to an apartment with air conditioning and taken a 9 month lease, I changed doctors, I planned a vacation to Wisconsin in August, I finally got to see a therapist and set up some counseling, I got my financing in order, as much as I can, and as of today, 99% of my stuff is moved to my new place which is only 2.5 miles from work.
I think that's a hell of a lot!
I have a lot less energy than I used to, I think my skin is getting slack, I'm sicker on these pills than I was at first, and, what? I don't know... I'm doing the best I can with the hand I've been dealt.
My new therapist, Krishna (gawd how 60's!) is willing to work with me on the things I think are important. She wants me to journal, and thinks that blogging isn't quite as "real" and I sort of agree, but I can't seem to get back into actual writing, so for now, this is it. I have to get over the idea that my nearest and dearest might read this. I am so into self-censoring to make sure they will still love me. We've had two meetings now. One meet and greet, and the one last week to make a plan. The highlight was her asking me, in an awkward form, if I really really am dying and do I have to deal with that stuff. Ya.... I think so.
She's ok though, She has some moxy and doesn't cop out. That's a good thing. Now I have to try to get across that I'm so friggin verbal I can sell ice cubes to .... no I can't, but I am full of a lot of bullshit, so it's always a danger.
Writing. I love to write and I hate that I can't write. I guess if I have a goal before I die I want to write a book. That is so scary. I always wanted to write a science fiction book, sort of like Heinlein where it was in some future space, but about people. But I am so undisciplined. What could I acomplish that would make me feel like my life has been worthwhile? THAT is the question.
I've messed up and blown so many things. I think I had a blessed life and I've made it harder and harder for no good reason. I guess I'm not sure what to do about that at this point. What to let go, what to fix, if I can, what to strive for that I didn't. I don't know. But aren't we here to do something?
Monday, June 2, 2008
There’s no scripted way to handle cancer
I was FINALLY able to see a therapist the other day. I've been waiting 9 months since I had to change to another program when my insurance changed. First my case-worker "forgot" for a few months, then there was a "gatekeeper" interview and more waiting, but finally I had a first meeting last week. I have no idea how that's going to go, but at least it gives me an opportunity to be "mad, sad, glad, scared" with someone who isn't going to be hurt or upset by something I may be experiencing. I'm glad I made it to this point!
| |
When Thumbs Up Is No Comfort
OVER the Memorial Day weekend, the actor Patrick Swayze, who is being treated for pancreatic cancer, made a pointedly public appearance at a Los Angeles Lakers game, looking strong-jawed and bright-eyed. He released a statement about his lively schedule and good response to therapy. Meanwhile, Senator Ted Kennedy, who had recently left Massachusetts General Hospital with a diagnosis of brain cancer, flashing crowds a thumbs up, competed in a sailing race. International headlines cheered, “Fight, Ted, Fight!”
As public figures are stricken with harrowing illness, the images of them as upbeat — think of the former White House spokesman Tony Snow, Elizabeth Edwards, the actress Farrah Fawcett — accompanied by stirring martial language, have almost become routine.
“Whether you’re a celebrity or an ordinary person, it’s obligatory, no matter how badly you’re feeling about it, to display optimism publicly,” said Dr. Barron H. Lerner, the author of “When Illness Goes Public.”
That optimism reassures anxious relatives, the public and doctors, regardless of whether it accurately reflects the patient’s emotional state. “If Ted Kennedy wanted to stick up his middle finger,” Dr. Lerner added, “that would be the more appropriate finger, but he’s doing what he is supposed to.”
Whether such images inspire patients, or reinforce unrealistic expectations that they, too, should maintain a game face, remains an open question, say doctors, social workers, family members and patients themselves.
Adam Lichtenstein, a founder of Voices Against Brain Cancer, a fund-raising and support organization, sees no down side to Mr. Kennedy’s composure. “It gives everyone else with his diagnosis a glimmer of hope,” said Mr. Lichtenstein, whose ebullient brother, Gary, was 24 when he died from a glioblastoma. “Patients think, ‘He’s fighting it, why can’t I?’ ”
But Rachel M. Schneider, a clinical social worker at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, said that while many patients are inspired by celebrities, others feel guilty for not being as upbeat as the celebrities appear, and angry that the gravity of the disease may be misrepresented. By being constantly reminded that they should keep their chin up, patients implicitly believe that emotional wobbliness will adversely affect their outcome.
“Hopefulness is real,” Ms. Schneider said. “But patients say, ‘I have to be positive, I can’t cry, I can’t let myself fall apart.’ And that is a burden.”
Certainly maintaining a game face is how many patients cap the eruption of terror and anxiety, in an effort to protect their loved ones and themselves. But not everyone is going to be brave, said Dr. Joseph J. Fins, chief of medical ethics at Weill Medical College of Cornell University. “We only hear about those who handle it well,” he said. “As a society we value the stoic but we don’t know what the stoicism hides.”
Although public figures promote enduring impressions of the stalwart, pumped-up spirit, he added, patients themselves often describe a more nuanced, evolving journey. When Robert Kosinski was told he had a tumor on top of his brain stem, entwined with his optic nerve, “Everything went dark, went blank,” he recalled. “I was overwhelmed by the idea that I had a brain tumor stuck inside me. The train ride home lasted so long and I just kept wondering, ‘How long do I have to live?’ ”
Faced with potentially harrowing repercussions from a biopsy, Mr. Kosinski, a husband and father in Jersey City, said he felt depressed and ultimately alone with his decisions.
He chose not to have the biopsy, and went through chemotherapy. He would endure a dozen blood transfusions. Optimism, or even stoicism, were not part of his emotional makeup during those grueling months. “I never felt brave or courageous,” Mr. Kosinski said. “I don’t know what that means. I was scared. I was the furthest you could be from courageous.”
That was 15 years ago. Mr. Kosinski, now 61, paints and attends a monthly support group, where he ascribes his odds-defying survival to luck and medical expertise, rather than personal will. “Some people in my group don’t want to hear the upbeat scenario,” he said. “The way they’re coping is completely the opposite because they feel they may not make it.”
It’s important for patients to realize that “there’s no scripted way to handle this,” Dr. Fins said. “They can write their own script based on their own narrative.
“If we fail to meet patients where their grief has taken them, we have sequestered them off,” he added. “Then patients and families talk about platitudes rather than what they’re really thinking.”
In the last 15 years, as patients have become more outspoken, a mushrooming amount of cancer narratives has legitimized a soulful range of responses to illness. The Internet teems with patients’ voices: communities gather to weep and wisecrack on sites like the uppity ChemoChicks or MyCancer, a National Public Radio blog by Leroy Sievers, a former television news producer .
Dr. Gary M. Reisfield, a palliative care specialist at the University of Florida, Jacksonville, believes that the language used by cancer patients and their supporters can galvanize or constrain them. Over the last 40 years, war has become the most common metaphor, with patients girding themselves against the enemy, doctors as generals, medicines as weapons. When the news broke about Senator Kennedy, he was ubiquitously described as a fighter. While the metaphor may be apt for some, said Dr. Reisfield, who has written about cancer metaphors, it may be a poor choice for others.
“Metaphors don’t just describe reality, they create reality,” he said. “You think you have to fight this war, and people expect you to fight.” But many patients must balance arduous, often ineffective therapy with quality-of-life issues. The war metaphor, he said, places them in retreat, or as losing a battle, when, in fact, they may have made peace with their decisions.
To describe a patient’s process through illness, he prefers the more richly ambiguous metaphor of a journey: its byways, crossroads, U-turns; its changing destinations; its absence of win, lose or fail.
Richard Haimowitz, 62, a lawyer in Queens who was found to have pancreatic cancer in January 2007, thought of himself as a warrior, fighting with all available ammunition.
“The day of my last treatment, people congratulated me, but I felt blindsided by my reaction,” Mr. Haimowitz said. “I thought, ‘Oh my God, I have nothing left to fight with,’ and I felt angry that there was nothing left for me to do.” Statistics to the contrary, Mr. Haimowitz has had two clean scans, is back at work and takes spinning classes. As he soldiered through treatment, Mr. Haimowitz recalled, he did not fear death, even though he did not want to die. Many studies published in oncology and mental health journals have looked at whether attitude is a factor in survival or recurrence rates, a core belief in many cultures and faiths. Some studies say yes, others no. They all have their critics.
“The thumbs-up attitude is very important,” said Darren Latimer, 33, a banker in Chicago who had surgery for a malignant brain tumor in May 2005, and still receives chemotherapy. “You can be in the dumps very quickly in our business, the business of being sick. But can you fight your disease and not yourself?”
Certainly patients need psychic resolve to make difficult decisions, prepare for stark regimens and to push back against bleak prognoses. The evolutionary biologist at Harvard, Stephen Jay Gould, whose doctors told him that eight months was the median survival rate of patients with his diagnosis, abdominal mesothelioma, wrote: “Attitude clearly matters in fighting cancer.” In his 1985 essay, “The Median Isn’t the Message,” he described how he then closely studied those grim statistics to optimize his chances. He died from another form of cancer 20 years after the initial diagnosis.
Uneasy well-wishers, steeped in near-superstitious belief about positive mental attitude, can exacerbate anxiety. On Cancerblog.com and ChemoChick’s “Excuse Me?” sites, lists of tone-deaf remarks include, “If anyone can beat it, it’s you,” “You gotta think positively” and “Just look at Lance,” a reference to Lance Armstrong, the champion cyclist and a cancer survivor.
Brian Wickman, a manager at a luxury hotel in Manhattan, needed to reframe his loved ones’ language. Two years ago, an oncologist told him there was little published data about the aggressive tumor on Mr. Wickman’s ankle because it was so rare and because, “no one wants to publish when all the subjects die.” A month later, Mr. Wickman, then 30, a skier and a rock climber, had his left leg amputated. He was also found to have thyroid cancer. He reacted severely to chemotherapy, and spent two months in intensive care.
His awestruck friends would say, “ ‘You’re so brave, I don’t know how you do it, you’re my inspiration.’ They would put me on a pedestal,” Mr. Wickman said. “That doesn’t allow me to be human and in pain, angry or depressed.”
HIS e-mail messages reveal a spirit of great equanimity and eloquence: Mr. Wickman, who now wears a prosthesis and has resumed athletic activities, will attend graduate school in the fall for a joint degree in social work and divinity.
But in his darker moments, he refused to construct a front. He would write bluntly about feeling grumpy, frustrated and afraid nobody would date him. “This is not a call for pity responses,” he would add. “Just let me be where I am.”
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Interesting Website, Interesting Lady!
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Cancer Survivor Day is Sunday June 1, 2008
Celebrate National Cancer Survivors Day® on Sunday, June 1, 2008
On Sunday, June 1, hundreds of communities throughout the United States, Canada, and other participating countries will observe the 21st annual National Cancer Survivors Day by hosting celebrations of life. NCSD events are filled with joy, camaraderie, hope, compassion, faith, and love. Cancer survivors are honored for their strength and courage, and the contributions of their families, friends, and healthcare providers are recognized.
The activities are as diversified as the towns and cities where the events are held and include parades, carnivals, races, art exhibits, ball games, contests, dances, inspirational programs, and more. Surviving cancer is an attitude about life and living each day to the fullest. NCSD helps call attention to the issues of cancer survivorship and will be commenced with greetings from President George W. Bush and the director of the National Cancer Institute.
A “survivor” is anyone living with a history of cancer – from the moment of diagnosis through the remainder of life, according to the National Cancer Survivors Day Foundation, which reports that an estimated 12 million Americans are cancer survivors.
National Cancer Survivors Day 2008 marks the 21st anniversary of this celebration of life, and the Foundation is encouraging everyone to participate in their community’s event. To locate the one nearest you, check with your local cancer treatment center, American Cancer Society office, or contact the Foundation at (615) 794-3006 or info@ncsdf.org. National Cancer Survivors Day 2008 is being sponsored nationally by AstraZeneca, Coping magazine, Lilly Oncology, and R. A. Bloch Cancer Foundation.
About the National Cancer Survivors Day Foundation
The non-profit National Cancer Survivors Day Foundation supports hundreds of hospitals, support groups, and other cancer-related organizations that host National Cancer Survivors Day events in their communities, by providing free guidance, education, and networking. Its primary mission is to educate the public on the issues of cancer survivorship in order to better the quality of life for cancer survivors.
About Cancer Survivorship
As the world celebrates life on National Cancer Survivors Day, the accomplishments of modern science are evident in the ever-growing cancer survivor population. Addressing the poorly understood needs of these survivors is becoming a formidable challenge.
A cancer diagnosis can leave a host of problems in its wake. Physical, financial, and emotional hardships often persist after diagnosis and treatment. Survivors may face many challenges such as hindered access to cancer specialists and promising new treatments, inadequate insurance, financial hardships, employment problems, and psychological struggles. To improve the quality of life of cancer survivors, more resources, research, and survivor-friendly legislation is needed.
CONTACT: PAULA CHADWELL
PHONE: 615-791-3834
E-MAIL: PCHADWELL@NCSDF.ORG
Friday, May 23, 2008
Freedom to work????
Things have progressed since my last post. I found a funding source to get back on Medicaid (yea!) and am continuing the Xeloda chemo pills. My last CT scan showed no growth, so they decided this time to continue rather than stop the treatment. All the other times my CT scans came back negative, they'd stop that chemo and start something else, or stop everything. Not sure WHAT that is all about.
I have an appointment with Dr. Dragovich at the center. He's the GI specialist Oncologist I mentioned before - that I didn't know he existed, let alone at my own clinic. That won't be until June, but I'm very excited about it. My Oncologist and I seem to have come to an impasse.
I wrote up a bunch of questions for her my last appt. One of them being the triphasic CT scan that the surgeon in CA said he'd need to see to give me an opinion. Her response (through the nurse) was "if she wants a triphasic CT scan, have that Dr in California order it". Wow. The nurse DID tell me that my doc in fact did consult Dr. Dragovich when my CT scan showed growth (in FEB) evidently it was HIS suggestion to try Xeloda. Nice to know. sheesh!
The bad news is that my sister, who's been my main support, is having surgery today for Breast Cancer! She had had several biopsies over the years, always negative, but this time they found a lump. Very small, but aggressive, since it's showed up so fast, but then they are catching it early. Such twists! We're hoping for a clean lumectomy (sp?) and they plan on some radiation. The whole family is reeling from both of us getting cancer at practically the same time.
I'm going back to the Midwest next week. I extended my trip to visit my daughter in Chicago to also go to Minneapolis to visit my sister. I'm so looking forward to that! It's strange all of a sudden being a "caretaker" (as much as I can from 2000 miles) as well as trying to deal with my own issues by myself here in AZ.
I'm feeling ok. Some transitory pain in my middle, diharrea from the Xeloda, and it seems I'm getting fluid around my liver. It doesn't show up on the scan, I guess, but I've gained 15 pounds for some reason (besides eating a lot!) and I can FEEL my middle expanding! The nurse said I have a "little" fluid at my last check up last week, but let it go at that. I just had to buy new pants however!
All in all I can't complain. They said my prognosis last August was 6-11 months, and we're at 9 months and I'm in good shape!
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Possibility of Surgery for Bile Duct Cancer?
When AHCCCS called, the woman explained some "in's and out's" of the spend down program and gave me some hope that this all might work out somehow and my medical expenses may get at least partially covered. We'll see! My advocate at the cancer center is in the process of getting appointments and billing timed as best as possible to cover as much as possible.
Last night I got ANOTHER call from someone from DES! I'm to call him back this morning, which I will as soon as it's office hours. (I'm still not sleeping much, so I've been up since 5am!) Didn't have a good night last night actually. This guy said that I should qualify for the "Freedom to Work" program of SS/DES. I've read up on it and am not sure. This whole thing about working and SSDI seems a slippery slope. I'll post more as soon as I hear what he has to say. In any case THEY ARE CALLING ME! That is the most shocking thing! When does a government service actually do that?
I also heard back last night from the Pittsburgh the UPMC Liver Cancer Center where I sent my CT scans and records. I called her back this morning. Dr Gamblin looked at my stuff and said it looked stable to him and as long as the systemic chemo was doing the job (keeping things from growing) he wouldn't change anything. I don't think he caught that the last scan showed some growth (to the doc's here anyway) and that they put me on Xeloda, but in any case it was a small amt of growth. He said though that I am NOT resectable. That's a major bit of news.
He said that if my tumors begin to grow again however, he'd recommend chemo embolization. That's where they temporarily block the blood flow to your liver and pump chemo stuff directly there, rather than throughout your entire body. I'll have to look this up again, but it's another procedure and often recommended for liver cancer. You can click on this Blog's title (Possibility of Surgery...) and it will take you to a link that has info on chemo embolization. It is at: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=chemoembol&bhcp=1 He also said my bilirubin count has to be less than 3. So far that's the case for me. Bilirubin is measured by a blood test, and mine is around 1. People who have bile duct blockage (which I don't, thank god!) tend to have jaundice and high bilirubin counts because the bile is not getting out of the liver. It's these two things that usually indicate bile duct cancer, but mine's "intrahepatic" meaning it's all inside my liver and there is no blockage.
So that was the good news-bad news for this morning so far - and it's only 8am!
Write a Letter!
Here's the latest version of the letter I'd been sending. Next post I'll tell you what happened!
LETTER
In August I was diagnosed with an incurable cancer. At the time it was CUP - cancer of unknown primary, now it’s emerged as bile-duct cancer. This is a rare and usually fatal disease. It is similar to Patrick Swayze's Pancreatic Cancer.
I'm 57 years old and otherwise in good health. I've now been through three different chemotherapies with no good effect so far.
My personal insurance was UPH, a program supported by the State to help small businesses insure their employees. Unfortunately the program overspent their "expectations" and beginning last year they started raising rates and cutting services to such an extent that when they changed again 9/1/07 I found that the insurance was no longer affordable for me. Instead of the zero co-pay the policy I bought had for diagnostic tests in September it was going to 20% co-pay. Just an FYI. The CT scans necessary to monitor the effect of chemo cost in the neighborhood of $4000 each and you need them frequently if your treatments don't go as hoped and they often don't with many cancers especially rare ones where there is not as much research being done.
I was told to apply for SSDI (Social Security Disability) and Medicaid. I easily qualified and so the first 6 months of my care were covered. However in February I began to receive disability - terrific as I was 3 months behind on rent working very few hours due to chemo side effects and was in a world of hurt. BUT then I found out that I no longer qualified for Medicaid (run by the states each with their own rules although it is basically a federal program). So as of April 1st I no longer have ANY medical coverage and no way to pay for the very expensive chemotherapy I am on.
Now the state HAD forseen this sort of problem. Even when you qualify for SSDI you have to wait an additional 2 years before you can receive MediCARE. So for two years you are on your own. Why. I don't know, but I was told it was one way that services were cut during a previous "crunch".
Arizona created a program for people like me who once they get disability make slightly too much to qualify for Medicaid. (To qualify as a single person for Medicaid you have to earn $867/month or less, for example) Not a lot.
Section 4733 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) allows States to provide Medicaid coverage to working individuals with disabilities who because of their earnings cannot qualify for Medicaid under other Statutory provisions. (They can't have much in the way of assets left either.)
Section 4733 allows States to provide Medicaid coverage to these individuals by creating a new optional "categorically needy" eligibility group.
Arizona had this program and funded it in 2007 but quickly it outspent their (optimistic?) projections. Now there is a "waiting list" that is HUGE of people waiting for it to get re-funded. As am I.
The program is only designed to temporarily help people like me who have catastrophic problems are on disability but have to wait for Medicare. They pay a premium on a sliding scale based on income. I'd be HAPPY to do that!
Instead it's not being funded and I am in the devastating position of not being able to do anything about my rare cancer. I can't even get a second opinion! (AHCCCS turned me down on March 31st even though any and every resource (including ACS) tells you that if you have an unusual cancer if you have no cure offered or several other criteria that I meet you SHOULD get a second opinion!) It's probably another cost-saving measure. In my case, since there are possible surgical solutions only done at Mayo Clinic, (the 2nd opinion I was trying to get). I am facing the "incurable" part pretty dramatically right now. Surgery, if possible, is the only real cure.
There IS a "spend down" option left which in my case means that if I spend all but a few dollars ($347) of my disability payments for three months completely on medical bills Medicaid will pay any remaining bills for 3 months. My question is how do I live on the $347? I'm still able to earn working very part time despite the disabling effects of cancer treatment, at the moment. But that $480/month only adds $480/month to my spend-down. I'm working because otherwise I'd starve and/or be homeless. Is this how we want to treat cancer victims?
What do I do?
